Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff's avatar

It's a little hard for me to parse what you're going for here? Is it that Tom Cotton's intention weren't as clearcut as Yglesias makes it out to be? I think that's true.

Or is it that Yglesias and others should ignore media failures on this subject, because to do otherwise provides ammunition for our political enemies? This seems like a bad path to me; a big difference between the left (well, the center-left) and right is that the center-left still attempts to build their beliefs based on reality. This in contrast to the right and its tribal epistemology.

It seems you're edging toward to advocating for a tribal epistemology on the left. IS that the case? Or am I missing something?

With regards to the statement: "Lab leak theory is still unproven" zoonotic origin is *also* still unproven. In fact there is more evidence (albeit circumstantial) for lab leak than their is for zoonotic; the case for the latter is--in summary--"That's how the last bat coronavirus crossed over."

Expand full comment
Rocketman's avatar

so if no one knows for sure, why the harsh criticism now of various people proposing origin theories, when, I should remind you, those stories were sometimes censored by social media or pilloried by MSM? I get that you don’t like Cotton, Trump et. al. but what if they are at least partially correct? Is it not important to fully understand the origin of this pandemic?

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts