8 Comments

I think your read on why Yglesias and others have been posting about the lab leak theory is misguided. It's not out of a sense of contrarianism, nor is it a culture war proxy. Rather it's because the meta conversation about the hypothesis--which featured a year of left-of-center types making strong claims about it being a conspiracy theory--evinces an unhealthy feature of left discourse.

Expand full comment

Is Greenwald really worth the trouble of bashing any more?

Expand full comment

I dont see how the quotes you provide show Greenwald was relying on IC info to conclude the lab leak theory is viable. The theory’s revival seems to have stemmed from a paper by Nicholas Wade in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. As you know, he was a NYT science reproter. The idea was discussed before Wade by many, but this seemed to lead to a major reconsideration with some virologists jumping in after to agree that the lab leak theory was possible in the sense of not being clearly proven false. Now, I agree with you, and contra Greenwald, that this is NOW being driven by concerns very loosely connected to science, and the IC is now OFFICIALLY as Biden has made them the lead investigators. I have not seen anything by Greenwald reacting to this but I doubt he would find them best placed to pursue the scientific questions. At any rate, what you cite does not support your claim that Greenwald is now soft on the IC and is happy to use them when they support his views. This is a vast overinterpretation of that tweet. It is clear you dislike Greenwald. But it is precisely for this reason that when you make an accusation it should be solidly based. Do you have more than this tweet?

Last point: Greenwald can be wrong that this lab leak thesis is not politically driven and nonetheless relying on evidence that the hypothesis is legit based on non IC material. These are not incompatible positions. Do you think they are?

Expand full comment

'....Spies love keeping secrets.....'

So do politicians and diplomats. Access to secret knowledge is power--power over those not in the know.

Expand full comment

He's a libertarian moralist. Moralists are consistent only in their own imagination.

Expand full comment